Self-Hosted Duplicati, Arq Backup, Backblaze Alternatives

7 replacements you can run on your own server — compared on what they are actually good at, not just what they claim.

Updated 2026-10-04

Why people look for a Duplicati, Arq Backup, Backblaze alternative

These three cover consumer and prosumer backup, and each has a real caveat rather than a fatal flaw. Backblaze's personal backup is inexpensive and honest, but your data sits with a company holding the keys unless you configure otherwise, and restoring a multi-terabyte archive means downloading it over days. Arq is a well-regarded paid client with a clean interface, but it is commercial software tied to a licence, and its value depends on the storage backend you point it at. Duplicati is open source and free, but its reputation for reliability has suffered from a long history of corruption and database-corruption issues reported by users, and its development has been intermittent — which is not what you want from the tool holding your only copy.

7 options, compared

Self-hosted alternatives to Duplicati, Arq Backup, Backblaze, compared by licence, difficulty and intended use
Tool License Setup Best for
Restic BSD-2-Clause Intermediate Encrypted backups straight to object storage
Duplicati LGPL-2.1 Beginner Set-and-forget encrypted server backups to cheap object storage
Kopia Apache-2.0 Intermediate Snapshot backups with per-source policies
BorgBackup BSD-3-Clause Advanced Efficient incremental backups to a repository you control
Backrest GPL-3.0 Beginner Using restic without learning its command line
rsnapshot GPL-2.0 Intermediate Simple local snapshots you can browse like a folder
UrBackup AGPL-3.0 Intermediate Backing up and restoring whole desktop machines

Which one should you pick?

Restic and BorgBackup are the two serious answers and they differ in a way that matters. Restic writes encrypted, deduplicated snapshots to any S3-compatible or SFTP backend — including, deliberately, a Backblaze B2 bucket if you want cheap storage without a closed client. BorgBackup is faster on large local datasets and has stronger integrity tooling, but needs SSH access to a real server. Kopia sits between them with a clean UI and repository format over the same ideas, and Backrest is a well-liked web UI for restic if the command line is the obstacle. Whichever you choose, the discipline that matters is not the tool: a backup is only real once you have test-restored it, and the schedule matters less than the restore you have actually performed.

Before you migrate

Self-hosting means you are the one who gets paged when something breaks at 11pm. Before committing, be honest about three things:

Migrating your data

Nearly every Duplicati, Arq Backup, Backblaze competitor listed above ships an import path — CSV, JSON, or a documented export format. The practical move is to migrate one project or one folder first, run both systems side by side for a week, and only then cut over. Export formats are rarely as clean as the marketing suggests, and it is much easier to notice a broken import on a test set than on five years of records.

More comparisons

Duplicati and Arq Backup and Backblaze are trademarks of their respective owners. Selfhostbase is not affiliated with or endorsed by Duplicati or Arq Backup or Backblaze. Comparisons reflect publicly available feature information and our own editorial judgement.